After several years of muted growth, European equity markets look like they’re at an inflection point. The momentum we saw in 2025 which pushed trade volumes to historical highs – has surged into 2026. For the first two months of this year, average daily value traded hit a record €104 billion for the first two months of the year, a 24% increase year-over-year, with record months for both January and February.
This strength suggests a fundamental shift away from volatility-driven trading toward consistent participation, signalling a broader asset-allocation toward Europe. It also provides a unique window of opportunity to transform this momentum into a resilient, world-class equity ecosystem.
By increasing transparency, reducing Europe’s opaqueness and transforming Europe’s post-trade infrastructure can help achieve this.
The transparency gap
To cement these gains, Europe addressing its transparency deficit is key. The upcoming consolidated tapes by both the EU and UK provide a foundation but long-term scalability could benefit from greater transparency for the region beyond the tapes. While the region is aggressively courting retail participation, the true scale of this activity remains siloed within individual exchanges.
Europe could implement changes similar to US SEC Rules 605 and 606, which require broker-dealers to publicly disclose execution quality and order routing data. Even when specific trades appear opaque, these mandates ensure that the broader market can hold participants accountable. While the US model democratises data to provide a clear view of market health, Europe’s lack of standardised public reporting keeps these insights out of reach. Bridging this gap would be essential for Europe to validate its growth and build a truly competitive marketplace.
While any potential adoption of US – SEC 605 and 606 style reporting would be a long-term objective and require significant change, in the short term, the EU could consider introducing a closing price flag harmonised with UK standards to clearly distinguish prints executed outside the primary closing auction.
Furthermore, transparency would be greatly enhanced by eliminating duplicate reporting between EU and UK jurisdictions and stripping out non-price-forming, off-book trades used solely for clearing. By removing this technical ‘noise’ the region can provide a higher-fidelity view of true liquidity, offering a cleaner data landscape while more comprehensive disclosure frameworks are developed. Equity ‘back to back swap’ activity is another area where greater transparency could be brought to the wider market.
Addressing the infrastructure friction
The European Commission’s push for a more harmonised landscape marks a significant step toward modernising Europe’s post-trade infrastructure. While trading itself is fragmented, the settlement layer is even more so, now burdened by 17 central clearing counterparties and 28 central securities depositories (CSDs).
Streamlining this environment could be critical to cutting friction and lowering costs. A centralised settlement framework would save investors money by eliminating the need to shift funds across multiple CSDs. However, achieving this Capital Markets Union vision faces a steep political climb. Member states may resist losing national CSDs in favour of a harmonised approach, making any negotiations between the Commission, parliament, and member states a decisive moment for European market efficiency.
Europe’s window of opportunity
It’s has been a long time since Europe has seen this kind of activity in its equity markets. To help keep and pull more global investors should use this momentum to deliver a world-class marketplace defined by clear transparent data and frictionless settlement and transform recent gains into a permanent, long-term magnet for global capital.