Sell-side firms duel for e-trading accolades

With the top three finishers named in the Trade Asia survey, attention now turns to which firms will win the trophies.

By None

A survey of algorithmic usage in Asia was carried out by the TRADE Asia during the summer and the top three firms in each category were announced last week.

The top three in each category now play-off to determine which one firm will win the trophy. That prize will be awarded at an event being held at the Conrad Hotel in Hong Kong on 13 November.

The tally of roll of honour appearances per firm is listed below. Leading the nominations, with five apiece are Citi and Morgan Stanley, which therefore pre-figures the possibility of Citi’s Ben Valentine or Morgan Stanley’s Zach Tuckwell each scooping a quintet of trophies.

Citi  5
Morgan Stanley 5
UBS  4
Bloomberg Tradebook3
J.P. Morgan 3
Liquidnet  3
Bank of America Merrill Lynch2
Barclays  2
Credit Suisse 2
Goldman Sachs 2
Instinet  2
ITG  2
Sanford Bernstein      2
BNP Paribas               1
CLSA  1
Deutsche Bank 1
Fidelity  1
Macquarie  1

 

And to remind you, the roll of honour again is as follows:-

 

REDUCING MARKET IMPACT

ITG

J.P. Morgan

Liquidnet                               


EXECUTION CONSISTENCY

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Citi

Credit Suisse


PRICE IMPROVEMENT

Citi

J.P. Morgan

Liquidnet


ANONYMITY

Bloomberg Tradebook

Instinet           

Morgan Stanley

 

 

EASE OF USE

Deutsche Bank

Goldman Sachs

Instinet


TRADER PRODUCTIVITY

Goldman Sachs

J.P. Morgan

Morgan Stanley

 

CUSTOMER SUPPORT  

BNP Paribas               

Citi

Macquarie

 

CUSTOMISATION  

Credit Suisse

Morgan Stanley

UBS


COSTS AND COMMISSIONS  

Bloomberg Tradebook

Morgan Stanley

UBS   


CROSSING

Citi

Liquidnet

UBS   

 

SPEED AND LATENCY  

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bloomberg Tradebook

Morgan Stanley          


EXECUTION CONSULTING AND ANALYTICS  

Citi

ITG

UBS


ONES TO WATCH

Following the example of the awards presented by The Trade magazine each year, ‘ones to watch’ are classified in two categories. Firstly those firms that appear, based on response numbers, to be winning clients. Secondly, those that, based on scores achieved, appear to be highly regarded by their clients.

RESPONSE NUMBERS

Barclays

CLSA

Sanford Bernstein      


CLIENT SCORES

Barclays

Fidelity

Sanford Bernstein      

The methodology

Survey respondents were asked to provide a rating for each algorithm provider on a numerical scale from 1.0 (very weak) to 7.0 (excellent), covering 12 functional criteria.

Each evaluation was weighted according to three characteristics of each respondent; the value of assets under management; the proportion of business done using algorithms; and the number of different providers being used. In this way the evaluations of the largest and broadest users of algorithms were weighted at up to three times the weight of the smallest and least experienced respondent.

In arriving at the overall roll of honour, the scores received in respect of each of the 12 functional capabilities were further weighted according to the importance attached to them by respondents to the survey. The aim is to ensure that in assessing service provision the greatest impact results from the scores received from the most sophisticated users in the areas they regard as most important.

 

«